The dominance of MMA on pay-per-view channels across North America is a recent phenomenon, contrasting with its past struggles against criticism and challenges for airtime. Mark Kerr, known as the “Smashing Machine,” exemplified this dichotomy with his fierce competitiveness in the octagon juxtaposed with his gentle demeanor outside of it. The film, “The Smashing Machine,” delves into Kerr’s rollercoaster career, showcasing his rise to glory, struggles with addiction, and personal challenges.
Kerr’s unwavering confidence in his physical prowess is tested as he faces setbacks, including addiction issues and strained relationships. Despite his imposing presence in the ring, Kerr’s aversion to real-life confrontations is highlighted, underscoring the complexities of his persona. The narrative of the film explores the evolution of MMA from its early days to its current regulated status, offering insights into Kerr’s personal journey within the sport.
However, “The Smashing Machine” falls short in providing a cohesive storyline, presenting a disjointed series of events without a clear character arc for Kerr. While Dwayne Johnson delivers a nuanced performance as Kerr, the film lacks depth in exploring his inner transformation. The movie’s reliance on Kerr’s domestic struggles and athletic challenges fails to offer a compelling or insightful narrative, resembling a patchwork of disconnected scenes rather than a profound character study.
Despite Johnson’s commendable portrayal, the film fails to capitalize on its potential, offering a lackluster depiction of Kerr’s life and career. The narrative lacks substance, relying on repetitive themes and missed opportunities for character development. While exploring familiar themes of athletic decline and personal turmoil, “The Smashing Machine” struggles to deliver a captivating and original story worthy of audience attention.