Jared Leto’s performance in “Tron: Ares” leaves much to be desired. The film, part of a sci-fi franchise burdened by excessiveness and lacking depth, falls short of expectations. Leto portrays a malfunctioning computer program seeking humanity, but his portrayal fails to elevate the movie beyond mediocrity.
Despite Leto’s aspirations for serious acting acclaim, his film choices, including “Suicide Squad” and “Morbius,” hinder his credibility in the industry. “Tron: Ares,” while not as abysmal as “Morbius,” struggles to impress critics, potentially tarnishing the franchise’s legacy.
Receiving early criticism as one of the worst big-budget films ever made, “Tron: Ares” disappoints before reaching audiences. The film’s lackluster content fails to evoke strong emotions, existing in a realm of forgettable blandness.
The narrative unfolds after the events of its predecessor, “Tron: Legacy,” introducing Eve Kim (Greta Lee) as the CEO of Encom corporation. The storyline delves into AI research and technological advancements, with Kim and her rival CEO, Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters), exploring the potential of cyberspace.
The movie delves into the creation of powerful assets from The Grid, including a destructive program named Ares. As the plot unfolds, the characters face challenges such as the search for the elusive “Permanence Code” and a kidnapping dilemma, leading to unexpected alliances and conflicts.
While “Tron: Ares” boasts sleek cinematography and a compelling Nine Inch Nails score, it falls short of its predecessors in terms of impact and originality. Leto’s performance, although present, lacks depth, adding to the film’s unremarkable nature.
Despite its missed opportunities to explore relevant themes like AI uprisings and tech company influence, “Tron: Ares” opts for action over substance. The film’s reluctance to engage with its potential for social commentary leaves viewers with a superficial experience, devoid of meaningful depth.
In conclusion, “Tron: Ares” falls short of its potential, offering fleeting entertainment value marred by its lack of substance. While it may not be the worst film ever made, its failure to engage with pertinent themes leaves it feeling hollow and uninspired.